Complicity or Strategy? U.S. Military Aid to Uganda Amid Growing Domestic Repression

Abstract

Christopher Korkor

This paper critically examines the implications of US military assistance to Uganda amid rising authoritarianism and deteriorating human rights under President Yoweri Museveni. US military aid to Uganda has long been justified on the grounds of counterterrorism, regional stability, and peacekeeping efforts. The administration’s domestic political repression, which includes the suppression of political opposition, civil society organizations, and media freedom, raises significant ethical and strategic concerns about the United States Government’s continuous support for the Ugandan regime. The paper explores the tension between US strategic interests, particularly in counterterrorism and regional stability, and the normative commitment to democratic governance and human rights. Documentary analysis was used to solicit information from official US government documents, congressional reports, State Department human rights assessments, and Ugandan domestic political trends. The paper argues that US assistance, while advancing counterterrorism objectives, contributes to state-led repression, which undermines democratic institutions and fuels public discontent. The paper also outlines how US military assistance undermines its credibility in promoting human rights and democracy in Uganda and examines whether security assistance unintentionally enables repression or could be leveraged to encourage political reform. The study examines policy alternatives that strike a balance between security cooperation and governance reforms, ensuring that US engagement does not inadvertently legitimize autocratic rule.

PDF