inner-banner-bg

Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology Insights(TAPI)

ISSN: 2641-0451 | DOI: 10.33140/TAPI

Research Article - (2019) Volume 2, Issue 1

Prospective Evaluation of Suicide Cases Presented to National Environmental and Clinical Toxicology Center, Egypt

Abla Abd El-rahman Ali *, Mona Mohamed Abd El-hamid Eldesoky , Iman Fawzy Gaballa and Mokhtar Fathy Abd El- satar
 
Department of Forensic Medicine and Clinical Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Egypt
 
*Corresponding Author: Abla Abd El-rahman Ali, Department of Forensic Medicine and Clinical Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Egypt

Received Date: Oct 18, 2019 / Accepted Date: Oct 24, 2019 / Published Date: Oct 31, 2019

Copyright: ©Copyright: ©2019 Abla Abd El-rahman Ali, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

Suicide is a tragic and potentially preventable public health problem. It is the 3rd leading cause of death among young adults worldwide. It was reported that drug overdose was the most common means of suicide in Egypt. Pesticides are a common suicidal agent. Aim of this study is to assess the prevalence of suicidal cases admitted to National Environmental and Clinical Toxicology Research Centre (NECTR) during six months period from (April to September 2017) regarding the most common poison used and different socio-demographic factors in attempt to identify high risk individuals in our community. This prospective study included 162 suicidal cases who were admitted to the National Environmental and Clinical Toxicological Research Center. The results of this study showed that the most frequent age group was those between 18-40 years (60.5%) followed by those below 18 years (33.3%) with female dominance (79%). The most frequently ingested agents were pesticides (34%) followed by miscellaneous agents (30.9%) then psychoactive agents (11.1%). The most common cause of attempting suicide was social problems (69.1%) followed by psychological causes (11.7%). The mortality rate was (4.3%)

Keywords

Prospective study, Suicide, Toxicity, Outcome, NECTR

Introduction

Suicide is a tragic and potentially preventable public health problem. It is defined by the forensic community as “death with the intent of taking one’s own life”. It is the 3rd leading cause of death among young adults worldwide. Attempted suicide is a common clinical problem seen in general hospital settings and the most commonly preferred mode is oral ingestion of poisons. Recently, a significant increase in hospital admissions due to drug overdose has been reported [1]. International studies indicate that suicidal behavior and in particular, the preferred method varies between countries where poisoning is the 2nd preferred suicide method in most countries. Preferred poisons were drugs in the form of tablets then rodenticides, pesticides and corrosives [2].

For young people, non-fatal suicidal behavior is more prevalent than completed suicides. However, those who survive suicidal attempts often harm themselves seriously and suffer from health consequences requiring long-term medical assistance. Efforts have been made to describe risk factors associated with repeated suicidal attempts [3].

Most information about suicides is reported from western countries. It is a global public health concern, claiming >1,000,000 lives/ year; it accounts for >38000 deaths. In the United States, rates have increased by >16% during the past decade, suggesting that current prevention strategies are of limited effect [4].

Deliberate self-poisoning is the most common method of attempted suicide, accounting for 85-95% of suicide-related hospital admissions. Drug overdose or intoxication (intentional or accidental), is one of the frequent causes of hospitalization. However, rates of overdose in different countries are greatly different and a significant increase in hospital admissions due to drug overdose has been recently reported a major proportion of these poisoned patients are following completed suicides and parasuicides [4].

Aim of Work To assess the prevalence of suicidal cases admitted to National Environmental and Clinical Toxicology Research Centre (NECTR) during six months period from (April to September 2017) regarding the most common poison used and different socio-demographic factors in attempt to identify high risk individuals in our community.

Subjects and Methods

Subjects

This is a prospective statistical study conducted on all suicidal cases presented to NECTR (National Environmental and Clinical Toxicological Research Center) during six months period from the beginning of April to the end of September 2017. All subjects had a history of suicide with drugs and/or other toxins.

Inclusion Criteria

-Those with alleged history of oral poison consumption for attempted suicide with an intention of self-harm

- Both sexes

- All ages

Patients' Exclusion Criteria

-Accidental ingestion

-Suspected or proven homicide cases

-Parental poison consumption

Methods

Cases were analyzed with respect to:

1. Demographic data → age, sex, residence, educational level, marital status, occupation and admission season

2. Primary data for patient's assessment include:

• Period of delay between occurrence of toxicity and arrival to NECTR

• Cause of attempting suicide

• Previous suicidal attempts

• Methods of previous attempts

• Types of administrated poison

• Dose of administrated poison

3. Data concerning physical examination on admission:

• Symptoms → GIT, respiratory, cardiovascular and CNS symptoms

• Signs → pulse, temperature, blood pressure, conscious level and pupil size

4. Data concerning laboratory investigations:

• Routine investigations

• Specific according to each poison

5. Data regarding lines of treatment:

• GIT decontamination

• Antidote administration

• Supportive management

• Symptomatic treatment

6. Whether the patient was admitted or not

7. Period of admission 8. Outcome of the case (cured, complicated, death)

Results

During the six-month duration (from the beginning of April to the end of September 2017) of the present study, 162 suicide cases presented at National Environmental and Clinical Toxicological Research Center (NECTR) with the following results:

A. Socio-Demographic Data

Table 1: Percentage of socio-demographic data among suicide studied cases

B.

 

Count

%

 

age

>18

54

33.3%

18-40

98

60.5%

40-60

10

6.2%

sex

male

34

21.0%

female

128

128 79.0%

residency

urban

128

79.0%

rural

34

21.0%

education

illiterate

34

21.0%

educated

128

79.0%

 

occupation

student

61

37.7%

work

40

24.7%

no

61

37.7%

 

marital state

single

101

62.3%

married

44

27.2%

engaged

17

10.5%

season

summer

106

65.4%

spring

56

56 34.6%

Table 1 showed that 54(33.3%) were below 18, 98(60.5%) were from 18-40 and 10(6.2%) were from 41-60yrs. 128(79%) were females and 34(21%) were males. 128(79%) living in urban areas and 34(21%) from rural areas. 128(97%) were educated and 34(21%) were illiterate. 61(37.7%) were students, 40(24.7%) were working and 61(37.7%) having no work. 101(62.3%) were single, 44(27.2%) were married and 17(10.5%) were engaged. 106(65.4%) were presented in summer and 56(34.6%) were presented in spring.

B. Historical Data of Studied Cases

Table 2: Percentage of historical data of studied cases

 

 

Count

%

poison type

CNS stimulant

14

8.6%

Pesticide

55

34.0%

CNS depressant

14

8.6%

Psychoactive

18

11.1%

analgesic antipyretic

11

6.8%

others

50

30.9%

poison dose

toxic

114

70.4%

not toxic

36

22.2%

lethal

12

7.4%

hours between exposure and presentation

less than 6 h

129

79.6%

from 6 to 12h

16

9.9%

from 12to 24h

11

6.8%

more than 24h

6

3.7%

previous treatment

yes

30

18.5%

no

132

81.5%

previous attempts

yes

30

18.5%

no

132

81.5%

method of previous

attempts

same method

18

60.0%

other method

12

40.0%

cause of attempting

suicide

social

112

69.1%

psychological

19

11.7%

love troubles

13

8.0%

Educational

18

11.1%

Table 2 showed that, 55(34%) of cases used pesticides, followed by others (antihypertensive, oral hypoglycemic, antibiotic and vitamins) 50(30.9%), while by psychoactive drugs 18(11.1%), then CNS (stimulant & depressant) with the number of cases 14(8.6%), and the least cases were analgesic antipyretics 11(6.8%). 114(70.4%) of cases administrated toxic dose, 36(22.2%) of cases presented with nontoxic dose and 12(7.4%) of cases presented with lethal dose. Cases presented within the first 6hs were (79.6%), those with a period of 6-12hrs delay were (9.9%), those of 12-24hrs were (6.8%) and those with > 24hrs delay were (3.7%). 132(81.5%) had no previous suicide attempts and 30(18.5%) had previous attempts. 18(60%) attempted suicide by the same method and 12(40%) attempted suicide by the other. 112(69.1%) of cases their causes of suicide were social, Followed by psychological causes 19(11.7%), then educational causes 18(11.1%) and the least due to love troubles were 13(8%).

Table 3: Percentage of clinical picture distribution among the studied cases

 

 

Number

%

Pulse

Normal

115

71%

Tachycardia

36

22.2%

Bradycardia

11

6.8%

Blood Pressure

Normal

135

83.3%

Hypotensive

27

16.7%

 

Hypertensive

0

0%

Temperature

Normal

158

97.5%

Feverish

4

2.5%

Conscious Level

Drowsy

33

20.4%

Conscious

119

73.5%

Comatose

10

6.2%

Pupil Size

Pin pupil size

31

19.1%

Normal

125

77.2%

Dilated

1

0.6%

Constricted

5

3.1%

GIT

manifestation

Present

88

54.3%

No

74

45.7%

CNS

manifestation

Present

68

42%

No

94

58%

CVS

manifestation

Present

34

21%

No

128

79%

Respiratory

Manifestation

Present

10

6.2%

No

152

93.8%

Table 3 Showed the Following

Pulse

(71%) of cases presented with normal pulse, (22.2%) of cases presented with tachycardia while (6.8%) of cases presented with bradycardia.

Blood Pressure

(83.3%) of cases were normal, (16.7%) of cases were hypotensive while no hypertensive cases were detected.

Temperature

(97.5%) of cases were normal, (2.5%) of cases were feverish and no cases presented with hypothermia.

Conscious Level

(73.5%) of cases were conscious, (20.4%) of cases were drowsy and comatose cases were (6.2%).

Pupil Size

(77.2%) of cases were with normal pupil size, (19.1%) of cases were with pin point pupil represented, (3.1%) of cases were with constricted pupil only one case with dilated pupil represented (0.6%).

GIT Manifestations

(54.3%) of cases presented with GIT manifestations, while (45.7%) of cases were without GIT manifestations.

CNS Manifestations

(42%) of cases presented with CNS manifestations, while (58%) of cases were without CNS manifestations.

CVS Manifestations

(21%) of cases presented with CVS manifestations, while (79%) of cases were without CNS manifestations.

Respiratory Manifestations

(6.2%) of cases presented with respiratory manifestations, while (93.8%) of cases were without respiratory manifestations

D. Investigations and Treatment Done For Studied Cases

Table 4: Percentage of investigations and treatment done for suicide studied cases

Investigations and treatment done for studied cases

 

 

Count

%

Routine

Normal

96

59.3%

Abnormal

41

25.3%

No

25

15.4%

Specific

Normal

37

22.8%

Abnormal

68

42%

No

57

35.2%

GIT decontamination

Yes

136

84%

No

26

16%

Supportive measures

Yes

131

80.9%

No

31

19.1%

Antidote

Yes

52

32.1%

No

110

67.9%

Symptomatic treatment

Yes

128

79%

No

34

21%

Enhanced elimination

Yes

1

0.6%

No

161

99.4%

Table 4 Shows Investigations and Treatment Done For Studied Cases

Routine Investigations

(59.3%) of cases routine investigations were done and the results were normal, while (25.3%) were abnormal and in (15.4%). investigations were not done.

Specific Investigations

(22.8%) of cases specific investigations were done and the results were normal, while (42%) were abnormal and in (35.2%) investigations were not done.

GIT Decontamination

It was done in (84%) of cases and not done in (16%).

Supportive Treatment

It was done in (80.9%) of cases and not done in (19.1%).

Antidote Treatment

It was done in (32.1%) of cases and not done in (67.9%).

Symptomatic Treatment

It was done in (79%) of cases and not done in (21%).

Enhanced Elimination

It was done in only one case (0.6%) and not done in (99.4%).

E. Admission and Outcome Data of Studied Cases

Table 5: Percentage of admission of suicide studied cases

Admission

 

 

Count

%

Admission

Yes

124

76.5%

No

38

23.5%

Period of

admission

Less than one day

10

6.2%

Less than one week

107

66%

More than one week

7

4.3%

No admission

38

23.5%

Table 5 Shows Percentage of Admission of Studied Cases Admission

(76.5%) of cases were admitted and (23.5%) were not admitted.

Period of Admission

(66%) of cases were admitted for the period less than one week (66%), followed by (6.2%) whom admitted for less than one day, while (4.3%) admitted for more than one week were and (23.5%) were not admitted.

F. Outcome Data of Studied Cases

Table 6: Relation between age and poison type among studied cases Pearson chi-square test

 

 

 

 

Age

 

Total

P Value

 

 

 

<18

18 - 14

41 - 60

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Poison type

Pesticide

Count

26

28

1

55

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.001*

% within poison type

47.3%

50.9%

1.8%

100%

% within age

48.1%

28.6%

10%

34%

CNS stimulant

Count

9

5

0

14

% within poison type

64.3%

35.7%

0%

100%

% within age

16.7%

5.1%

0%

8.6%

CNS depressant

Count

2

12

0

14

% within poison type

14.3%

85.7%

0%

100%

% within age

3.7%

12.2%

0%

8.6%

Psychoactive

Count

4

10

4

18

% within poison type

22.2%

55.6%

22.2%

100%

% within age

7.4%

10.2%

40%

11.1%

Analgesic

antipyretic

Count

4

7

0

11

% within poison type

36.4%

63.6%

0%

100%

% within age

7.4%

7.1%

0%

6.8%

Others

Count

9

36

5

50

% within poison type

18%

72%

10%

100%

% within age

16.7%

36.7%

50%

30.9%

Total

Count

54

98

10

162

% within poison type

33.3%

60.5%

6.2%

100%

% within age

100%

100%

100%

100%

(*) P < 0.05 is statistically significant. P value >0.05 is statistically insignificant.

As observed from Table 6 there was statistical significant relation between age and poison type (p value=0.001). As regard the relation between poison type and different studied age groups, It was found that, in the group (<18 years) pesticides were the most common toxic agent (48.1%), while CNS stimulants and other drugs (antihypertensive, oral hypoglycemic, antibiotic and vitamins) had equal shares (16.7%). In the age group (18-40years) other drugs were the most common toxic agent (36.7%), while pesticides (28.6%) were the second common among this age group. In the group (41-60years) other drugs were the most common toxic agent (50%), while psychoactive drugs were second common among this age group.

Table 7: Relation between sex and poison type among studied cases using Pearson chi-square test

 

 

 

Sex

Total

P Value

 

 

 

male

Female

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Poison type

Pesticide

Count

16

39

55

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.005*

% within poison type

29.1%

70.9%

100%

% within age

47.1%

30.5%

34%

CNS stimulant

Count

1

13

14

% within poison type

7.1%

92.9%

100%

% within sex

2.9%

10.2%

8.6%

CNS depressant

Count

5

9

14

% within poison type

35.7%

64.3%

100%

% within sex

14.7%

7%

8.6%

Psychoactive

Count

6

12

18

% within poison type

33.3%

66.7%

100%

% within sex

17.6%

9.4%

11.1%

Analgesic

antipyretic

Count

3

8

11

% within poison type

27.3%

72.7%

100%

% within sex

8.8%

6.2%

6.8%

Others

Count

3

47

50

% within poison type

6%

94%

100%

% within sex

8.8%

36.7%

30.9%

Total

Count

34

128

162

% within poison type

21%

79%

100%

% within sex

100%

100%

100%

(*) P < 0.05 is statistically significant. P value >0.05 is statistically insignificant.

As observed from Table 7 there was statistical significant relation between sex and poison type (p value=0.005). It was found that, pesticides were the most common toxic agent (47.1%) in males, followed by psychoactive drugs as the second common toxic agent (17.6%). While in females, other drugs (antihypertensive, oral hypoglycemic, antibiotic and vitamins) (36.7%) were the most common toxic agent followed by pesticides (30.5%).

Table 8: Relation between educational level and poison type among studied cases using Pearson chi-square test

 

 

 

Sex

Total

P Value

 

 

 

male

Female

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Poison type

Pesticide

Count

16

39

55

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.005*

% within poison type

29.1%

70.9%

100%

% within age

47.1%

30.5%

34%

CNS stimulant

Count

1

13

14

% within poison type

7.1%

92.9%

100%

% within sex

2.9%

10.2%

8.6%

CNS depressant

Count

5

9

14

% within poison type

35.7%

64.3%

100%

% within sex

14.7%

7%

8.6%

Psychoactive

Count

6

12

18

% within poison type

33.3%

66.7%

100%

% within sex

17.6%

9.4%

11.1%

Analgesic

antipyretic

Count

3

8

11

% within poison type

27.3%

72.7%

100%

% within sex

8.8%

6.2%

6.8%

Others

Count

3

47

50

% within poison type

6%

94%

100%

% within sex

8.8%

36.7%

30.9%

Total

Count

34

128

162

% within poison type

21%

79%

100%

% within sex

100%

100%

100%

(*) P < 0.05 is statistically significant. P value >0.05 is statistically insignificant.

As observed from Table 8, there was a statistically significant relation between poison type and educational level (p value=0.002).

Regarding relation between poison type and educational level of studied cases, it was found that the most common poison in educated cases was other drugs (antihypertensive, oral hypoglycemic, antibiotic and vitamins) (35.2%) followed by pesticides (25.8%). On the other hand, the most common poison in illiterate cases was pesticides (64.7%) followed by other drugs (14.7%).

Table 9: Relation between conscious level and poison type among studied cases using Pearson chi-square test

 

 

 

Conscious level

Total

P value

 

 

 

Drowsy

Conscious

Comatose

Poison type

Pesticide

Count

2

48

5

55

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

<0.001*

% within poison type

3.6%

87.3%

9.1%

100%

% within conscious level

6.1%

40.3%

50.0%

34%

CNS stimulant

Count

0

14

0

14

% within poison type

0%

100%

0%

100%

% within conscious level

.0%

11.8%

.0%

8.6%

CNS depressant

Count

11

2

1

14

% within poison type

78.6%

14.3%

7.1%

100%

% within conscious level

33.3%

1.7%

10%

8.6%

Psychoactive

Count

13

3

2

18

% within poison type

72.2%

16.7%

11.1%

100%

% within conscious level

39.4%

2.5%

20%

11.1%

Analgesic

antipyretic

Count

1

10

0

11

% within poison type

9.1%

90.9%

0%

100%

% within conscious level

3.0%

8.4%

0%

6.8%

 

Others

Count

6

42

2

50

% within poison type

12%

84%

4%

100%

% within conscious level

18.2%

35.3%

20%

30.9%

 

Total

Count

33

119

10

162

% within poison type

20.4%

73.5%

6.2%

100%

% within conscious level

100%

100%

100%

100%

(*) P < 0.05 is statistically significant. P value >0.05 is statistically insignificant.

As observed from Table 9 there was a statistically significant relation between the conscious level and poison type (p value <0.001). As regard the relation between the conscious level and poison type, it was found that that the highest percentage of comatose cases was due to pesticides poisoning (50%), while drowsy cases were due to psychoactive drugs followed by CNS depressant as follows (39.4%), (33.3%) respectively. On the other hand (40.3%) of the conscious cases presented with pesticide poisoning followed by other drugs (types (antihypertensive, oral hypoglycemic, antibiotic and vitamins) (35.3%).

Table 10: Relation between conscious level and poison dose among studied cases using Pearson chi-square test

 

Conscious level

Total

P value

Drowsy

Conscious

Comatose

Poison dose

Not toxic

Count

4

31

1

36

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.007*

% within poison dose

11.1%

86.1%

2.8%

100%

% within conscious level

12.1%

26.1%

10%

22.2%

Toxic

Count

27

82

5

114

% within poison dose

23.7%

71.9%

4.4%

100%

% within conscious level

81.8%

68.9%

50%

70.4%

Lethal

Count

2

6

4

12

% within poison dose

16.7%

50%

33.3%

100%

% within conscious level

6.1%

5%

40%

7.4%

Total

Count

33

119

10

162

% within poison dose

20.4%

73.5%

6.2%

100%

% within conscious level

100%

100%

100%

100%

(*) P < 0.05 is statistically significant. P value >0.05 is statistically insignificant.

As observed from Table 10, there was a statistically significant relation between the conscious level and poison dose (p value = 0.007). Regarding the relation between conscious level and the poison dose, it was found that comatose cases presented with toxic dose (50%) followed by lethal dose (40%), also the highest percentage of drowsy cases was due to toxic dose (81.8%) followed by nontoxic (12.1%). On the other hand conscious cases presented with toxic dose (68.9%) followed by nontoxic dose (26.1%).

Table 11: Relation between outcome and poison type among studied cases using Pearson chi-square test

 

 

 

 

Sex

Total

P Value

 

 

 

Complicated

Cured

Died

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Poison type

Pesticide

Count

7

42

6

55

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.005*

% within poison type

12.7%

76.4%

10.9%

100%

% within age

38.9%

30.7%

85.7%

34%

CNS stimulant

Count

1

13

0

14

% within poison type

7.1%

92.9%

0%

100%

% within sex

5.6%

9.5%

0%

8.6%

CNS depressant

Count

2

12

0

14

% within poison type

14.3%

85.7%

0%

100%

% within sex

11.1%

8.8%

0%

8.6%

Psychoactive

Count

1

17

0

18

% within poison type

5.6%

94.4%

0%

100%

% within sex

5.6%

12.4%

0%

11.1%

Analgesic

antipyretic

Count

2

9

0

11

% within poison type

18.2%

81.8%

0%

100%

% within sex

11.1%

6.6%

.0%

6.8%

Others

Count

5

44

1

50

% within poison type

10%

88.0%

2.0%

100%

% within sex

27.8%

32.1%

14.3%

30.9%

Total

Count

18

137

7

162

% within poison type

11.1%

84.6%

4.3%

100%

% within sex

100%

100%

100%

100%

(*) P < 0.05 is statistically significant. P value >0.05 is statistically insignificant.

As observed from Table 11, there was no statistically significant relation between the outcome and poison type. Regarding the relation between the outcome and the poison type, it was found that the highest mortality rate and complicated cases was seen in pesticides poisoning (85.7%), (38.9%) respectively. On the other hand, highest percentage of cured cases was seen in other drugs types (antihypertensive, oral hypoglycemic, antibiotic and vitamins) (32.1%).

Discussion

Suicide is an important, worldwide problem; rate increased by 60% approximately. Suicide trends in studied countries are stable or decreasing for females and increasing for males especially younger age groups, but it increases with age. Methods used for suicide changed over time in different countries, partly due to differential availability and socio-cultural acceptability of such methods [5].

In the present study, the most affected age group was those between 18-40 yrs (60.5%). Possible reasons include family problem, education difficulties, marriage issues and employment leading to a stressed life style with more suicidal attempts, followed by those below 18(33.3%). The least affected group was that between 41-60 yrs (6.2%).

In our work, female cases (79%) overcome male cases (21%), the female predominance appears to be due to more exposure to violence and stress or strain as compared with males in this part of the world. It might be related to the lower level status of women in both family and society. In countryside, women have low level of education and participation in social life, therefore, they have difficulty in reducing their stress [6]. Regarding residency, cases from urban areas (79%) overcome those from rural areas (21%). This is explained by the presence of (NECTR) at great Cairo, as it lies closer to most of urban areas. These data were consistent with those reported by a study done in Ontario, Canada, from April 2002 to December 2011, where cases from urban areas (86.4%) overcome those from rural areas (13.6%) [4].

As regard the education, the educated cases (79%) overcome illiterate cases (21%) This was in accordance with the study done in the Poison Control Center of Ain Shams University Hospitals (PCCA), during the period from June 2007 until the end of July 2008, where most of cases were educated [7].

The present study demonstrated that most of the cases were students and jobless people with the same number represented (37.7%) then employed were (24.7%). In the same context the study of Ain Shams University Hospitals (PCCA), during the period from June 2007 until the end of July 2008, had made a study that showed that suicide cases were more common among non-employed (56.8%) [7].

The marital status of our cases was as following single (62.3%), married (27.2%) and engaged (10.2%). Also our data are similar to those obtained from the study of Kermanshah Imam Khomeini Hospital, Iran from June to September 2008 where percentage of single cases was (59.9%) [8].

Our study was performed in only 2 seasons (spring and summer), the suicide rate was higher in summer (65.4%) than spring (34.6%). Similar results were obtained from the study done in china. During the period of 2000 to 2006, where the majority of cases presented in summer [6].

The current data showed that pesticides were the most common toxic agents (34%) followed by the following agents in descending order of frequency; other drugs (30.9%), psychoactive drugs (11.1%), CNS depressants and stimulants had the same percentage (8.6%) and analgesic antipyretics (6.8%). This is explained by the accessibility and availability of pesticides. In the same context the study of Southern India, from January 2000 to December 2004. Where organophosphates were the exclusive choice in most of the males (82.2%) and females (58.3) [9].

The present study demonstrated that the dose was evaluated as toxic in (70.4%), nontoxic dose (22.2%) and lethal (7.4%). This was in accordance with the study done in The Czech Toxicological Information Centre (TIC) in Prague over the period of 2007-2011, The dose was evaluated as toxic in (73.4%), this explained by cases are often less certain of the potential hazards and possible fatal outcome of their attempt, and their actions in taking a toxic agent are impulsive [3].

The present study demonstrated that the majority of cases had no previous suicide attempts (81.5%). The current data were similar to those obtained from study done in Tehran, Iran, from January to December 2003, among the suicidal cases only (7%) had a history of previous suicidal attempt [10]. Regarding the causes of attempting suicide, the present study showed that the social causes were the commonest (69.1%), followed by psychological causes (11.7%), then educational troubles (11.1%) and the least were love troubles (8%). This was in accordance with the study done in Government Stanley Hospital, at toxicology unit of IMCU from February 2015-August 2015, where the most common cause among cases was family problems (51%) [11].

In the current study (76.5%) of cases were admitted and (23.5%) of cases didn’t required admission. Because majority of cases had symptoms and their dose was evaluated as toxic, so they were admitted. This was in accordance with the study done in Adana, Turkey from January to December 2004 where (88%) of cases were admitted [12].

In the present study, the majority of cases recovered (84.6%), complicated cases (11.1%) and the mortality rate was (4.3%). This explained by early presentation to (NECTR) and so treatment was started early. These data were similar those reported by a study done in Adana, Turkey from January to December 2004 where the majority of cases recovered (99.1%) [12].

There was significant difference in relation between toxin type and age in our study regarding pesticides among the three studied age groups, the age group (18-40) had the highest percentage of toxin intake (60.5%), also there was significant difference in relation between toxin type and sex where other drugs preferred (36.7%) by females followed by pesticides were (30.5%). The explanation of other drugs (antihypertensive, oral hypoglycemic, antibiotic and vitamins) is availability in all homes and the use of pesticide in eradication of insects at home. Which was similar to results obtained in the study done Southern India, from January 2000 to December 2004. Where organophosphates were preferred by middle age group especially females [9]. There was significant relation between toxin type and educational level; in our study all toxins used by victims were higher among educated group because educated group represented the majority of our study.

Conclusion

The current piece of work suggests that most of the poisoning cases involved age group 18 to 40 years. Females were more commonly affected than males. Social problems were the most common causes of attempting suicide. Pesticides followed by miscellaneous drugs contributed most of the suicide cases and the mortality rate was (4.3%).

References

  1. Rangarajan J, Somanathan GC, Srinivasan MR, Krishnaraj R, Mohanan SS, et al. (2016) A study on profile of orally ingested poisons in self-harm (attempted suicide) at toxicology unit, government Stanley medical college. Journal of evolution of medical and dental sciences-jemds 5: 2087-2091.
  2. Li L, Liao X, Zhang G, Sun D, Yang T, et al. (2015) Characteristics of Suicides Caused by Drug Overdose in the State of Maryland. Journal of Forensic Science and Medicine 1: 38.
  3. Zakharov, Sand Navratil T, Pelclova D (2013) Suicide attempts by deliberate self-poisoning in children and adolescents. Psychiatry research 210: 302-307.
  4. Finkelstein Y, Macdonald EM, Hollands S, Sivilotti ML, Hutson JR, et al. (2015) Risk of suicide following deliberate self- poisoning. JAMA psychiatry 72: 570-575.
  5. Lin JJ, Lu TH (2008) Suicide mortality trends by sex, age and method in Taiwan, 1971-2005. BMC Public Health 8: 6.
  6. Zhang X, Hai-Shan LI, Qiu-Hong ZHU, Jing Z, Zhang S, et al. (2008) Trends in suicide by poisoning in China 2000-2006: age, gender, method, and geography. Biomedical and environmental sciences 21: 253-256.
  7. Ghanem M, Gamaluddin H, Mansour M, Afaf Abdel Samiee, Nermin Mahmoud Shaker, et al. (2015) Role of Impulsivity and Other Personality Dimensions in Attempted Suicide with Self-Poisoning among Children and Adolescents. Archives of Suicide Research 17: 262-274.
  8. Rezaie L, Khazaie H, Soleimani A, Schwebel DC (2011) Is self-immolation a distinct method for suicide? A comparison of Iranian patients attempting suicide by self-immolation and by poisoning. Burns 37: 159-163.
  9. Kanchan T, Menezes RG (2009) Suicidal poisoning in Southern India: Gender differences –Authors’ response. Journal of forensic and legal medicine 16: 365.
  10. Shadnia S, Esmaily H, Sasanian G, Pajoumand A, Hassanian- Moghaddam, et al. (2007) Pattern of acute poisoning in Tehran- Iran in 2003. Human & experimental toxicology 26: 753-756.
  11. Jayanthi R, Muralidharan RS, Gauthaman CS (2015) An observational study on orally ingested poison cases in attempted suicide at toxicology unit of imcu, stanley medical college. Stanley Medical Journal 2: 12-13.
  12. Akbaba M, Nazlican E, Demirhindi H, Sütoluk Z, Gökel Y (2007) Etiological and demographical characteristics of acute adult poisoning in Adana, Turkey. Human & experimental toxicology 26: 401-406.