From Oath to Action: Addressing Ethical Challenges in Indonesia’s Medical System

Introduction

The Hippocratic Oath is more than a ceremonial tradition—it is a solemn ethical commitment that binds physicians to the ideals of beneficence, non-maleficence, justice, and collegial solidarity [1-4]. In many countries, including Indonesia, these principles are deeply valued by countless medical professionals who strive to serve with compassion and excellence. However, persistent systemic issues threaten the full realization of these ideals. Across the nation, cases of corruption, favouritism, institutionalized bias, and hierarchical intimidation have surfaced, challenging the moral fabric of the profession. This article is not an indictment of individual doctors, many of whom display remarkable dedication and integrity in the face of adversity. Instead, it is a call to confront structural dysfunctions that compromise ethical practice, especially for physicians from underrepresented ethnic or religious groups. It aims to provoke thoughtful dialogue and inspire reform, not blame.

Bethsaida Hospital, under the leadership of Prof. Dasaad Mulijo- no, offers one example of how institutions can strive to embody the Hippocratic values through an inclusive, patient-centred, and spir- itually grounded model of care. Such examples demonstrate that ethical medicine is not an ideal of the past, but a living possibility when moral courage and institutional integrity are prioritized.

Ethical Challenges in The Indonesian Medical Landscape

Systemic Corruption and Nepotism

In medical education and specialist training, deviations from a merit-based process, such as favouritism, informal payments, and preferential treatment, have been widely reported. These trends risk eroding public trust and can disillusion talented individuals who lack connections in politics or finance. When access to opportunity is perceived as inequitable, morale declines and ethical standards suffer [5–8].

Ethnic and Religious Underrepresentation

Doctors from minority ethnic and religious groups, particularly Chinese Indonesians and non-majority faith practitioners, have reported disproportionate barriers to academic and professional advancement. Though many excel clinically, they may face opaque evaluations, exclusion from leadership pipelines, or administrative delays. These patterns—while not universally practiced—highlight a need for stronger equity safeguards across institutions [9–12].

Hierarchical Bullying and Professional Marginalization

In some training hospitals, a rigid hierarchy fosters environments where junior doctors may face undue pressure, humiliation, or even career sabotage for challenging outdated practices or introducing patient-centred innovations. Minority physicians advocating for newer modalities—such as lifestyle medicine—have sometimes been labelled as disruptive or unorthodox, rather than engaged contributors [13–15].

Discrepancy Between Oath and Reality

Despite formal adherence to the Hippocratic Oath, the realities of practice may diverge. Competition, institutional pressures, and systemic inefficiencies can lead to environments where collegial respect is compromised. This disconnect raises ethical questions not of personal failure, but of structural design, suggesting that safeguarding ethics requires more than individual goodwill; it demands supportive, transparent systems [16–19].

Bethsaida Hospital: Ethical Practice in Action

Bethsaida Hospital was founded with a clear moral vision: to treat each patient and colleague with dignity, equity, and empathy. Under Prof. Dasaad Mulijono’s leadership, it has become a model for cultivating ethical practice even in challenging contexts. The hospital enforces a zero-tolerance policy toward discrimination and bullying, actively recruits based on merit and character, and champions patient-centred, evidence-based care, including the integration of lifestyle medicine.

Rather than being an exception, Bethsaida represents a possibility for healthcare institutions throughout Indonesia—a tangible reminder that professionalism rooted in compassion and fairness is both achievable and sustainable. Since 2024, Bethsaida has welcomed physicians previously marginalized elsewhere, offering them a platform to thrive. These efforts demonstrate how inclusive leadership can elevate the moral climate of an institution, benefiting both practitioners and patients. Bethsaida has also emerged as a sanctuary for previously marginalized minorities, empowering them to contribute their academic and professional gifts without the fear of suppression, intimidation, or systemic exclusion. This shift not only restores justice but sets a powerful precedent for what ethical, inclusive, and spiritually grounded healthcare can look like in a modern society.

Proposed Reforms for Ethical Revitalization

Ai-Based Transparency in Selection and Evaluation

By employing AI-driven systems for admissions, job placements, and promotions, the medical profession can reduce subjective bias and foster a meritocratic environment. These tools can be programmed to evaluate candidates on objective criteria such as academic records, clinical performance, research impact, and patient satisfaction [20–23].

Legal Protections and Enforcement

Ethical lapses must carry real consequences. Strengthening laws against discrimination, bribery, and abuse of authority—and ensuring that they are enforced without bias—will help deter misconduct. Licensing boards and professional associations must also uphold ethical standards through transparent accountability processes [24–26].

Whistleblower Support

Creating robust frameworks to protect and reward medical professionals who report systemic problems is essential. Anonymity, job security, and formal recognition can embolden ethical leadership and uncover hidden malpractice without fear of retaliation [27–30].

Ethics Education and Mentorship

Ethical reasoning, empathy, and cultural sensitivity should be emphasized throughout medical training, not only as abstract theory but as living practice reinforced by mentors and institutional culture. Training programs must model the very virtues they aim to instill [31–34].

 Inclusive Leadership and Representation

Medical leadership should reflect Indonesia’s rich ethnic and cultural diversity. Ensuring fair representation in decision-making bodies helps break long-standing patterns of exclusion. Diversity audits, inclusive recruitment policies, and open-door feedback mechanisms can accelerate progress [35–38].

Safe Dialogue Forums for Professional Advocacy

Hospitals and professional bodies should regularly host forums for ethical dialogue, peer reflection, and collaborative reform. Independent ethics committees can provide oversight, mediation, and guidance when internal conflicts arise [39–42].

Conclusion

A nation's healthcare system is a reflection of its moral values. While many Indonesian doctors continue to serve with excellence and integrity, the system within which they operate must evolve to support, not undermine, their ethical commitments. Addressing the roots of corruption, bias, and intimidation is not a matter of personal judgment but of collective responsibility.

Bethsaida Hospital’s example shows that ethical medicine is not idealistic—it is practical, scalable, and urgently needed. By embracing reforms grounded in transparency, equity, and compassion, Indonesia can transform its medical institutions into spaces where every patient is treated with dignity and every doctor is empowered to live up to the oath they once took—not in word, but in truth.

References

1. Askitopoulou, H. (2024). The Hippocratic principle “to help or at least to do no harm”. Transfusion Clinique et Biologique, 31(3), 174-180.
2. Askitopoulou, H., & Vgontzas, A. N. (2018). The relevanceof the Hippocratic Oath to the ethical and moral values of contemporary medicine. Part II: interpretation of the Hippocratic Oath—today’s perspective. European spine journal, 27(7), 1491-1500.
3. Stigall, W. (2022). The hippocratic oath. The Linacre Quarterly, 89(3), 275-286.
4. Jotterand, F. (2005). The Hippocratic oath and contemporary medicine: dialectic between past ideals and present reality?. The Journal of medicine and philosophy, 30(1), 107- 128.
5. Togioka, B., & Young, E. (2024). Diversity and discrimination in health care. StatPearls.
6. Williams, M. S., Myers, A. K., Finuf, K. D., Patel, V. H., Marrast, L. M., Pekmezaris, R., & Martinez, J. (2023). Black physicians’ experiences with anti-Black racism in healthcare systems explored through an attraction-selection-attrition lens. Journal of business and psychology, 38(1), 75-88.
7. Webster, C. S., Taylor, S., Thomas, C., & Weller, J. M. (2022). Social bias, discrimination and inequity in healthcare: mechanisms, implications and recommendations. BJA education, 22(4), 131-137.
8. Ricks, T. N., Abbyad, C., & Polinard, E. (2022). Undoing racism and mitigating bias among healthcare professionals: lessons learned during a systematic review. Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities, 9(5), 1990-2000.
9. Walujono, A. (2014). The discrimination of the ethnic Chinese in Indonesia and perceptions of nationality.
10. Tyson, A. (2003). Realities Of Discrimination In Indonesia: The Case Of The Civil Service. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 2(2).
11. Dhaneswara N. Minority Feelings: Chinease Ethnic In Indonesia, 4th International Conference on Social Scince, Humanities and Arts, 21-23 April 2023.
12. Rikardi, A. A. (2023). The Role of Realistic Threats to Prejudice against Ethnic Chinese in Indonesia. Madani Jurnal Politik Dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan, 15(02), 310-321.
13. Rima, S. P. P., Bumantari, A. F., Nabillah, B. I., Malufti, C. N., Adhiguna, G., Hadianto, H., ... & Setiawan, Y. P. (2024). A Comprehensive Approach to Ending Bullying in Indonesia's Medical Residency Programs: A Policy Brief. Acta Neurologica Indonesia, 2(03).
14. Wahyuni D, Reswari PAD. Efforts to prevent Bullying Against Students in the Specialist Medical Education Program, Field of People’s Welfare, INFO, a brief study of actual and strategic issues, Vol XVI, no.16/II/Pustaka/ August 2024.
15. Saleh, R. F. R., Sopardireza, A. F., Wijaya, A. R., Maharani, B. N., & Sari, S. M. Exploring The Perception and Potential of Bullying among First-Year Medical Students In Indonesia: A Qualitative Study. Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia: The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education, 14(1), 32-43.
16. Retsas, S. (2004). Treatment at random: the ultimate science or the betrayal of Hippocrates?. Journal of clinical oncology, 22(24), 5005-5008.
17. Lenzer, J. (2006). Oath Betrayed: Torture, Medical Complicity, and the War on Terror. BMJ, 333(7564), 401.
18. Dean,  W.  (2023).  Moral  Injury  and  Preserving  Our Profession. Missouri Medicine, 120(6), 423.
19. Kumar, A. (2010). Hippocratic oath, 21st century. Indian Journal of Surgery, 72(2), 171-175.
20. Hallquist, E., Gupta, I., Montalbano, M., & Loukas, M. (2025). Applications of Artificial Intelligence in medical education: a systematic review. Cureus, 17(3).
21. Soulami, M., Benchekroun, S., & Galiulina, A. (2024). Exploring how AI adoption in the workplace affects employees: a bibliometric and systematic review. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 7, 1473872.
22. Chen, Z. (2023). Collaboration among recruiters and artificial intelligence: removing human prejudices in employment. Cognition, Technology & Work, 25(1), 135-149.
23. Hunkenschroer, A. L., & Kriebitz, A. (2023). Is AI recruiting (un) ethical? A human rights perspective on the use of AI for hiring. AI and Ethics, 3(1), 199-213.
24. Chandra, A., Frakes, M., & Malani, A. (2017). Challenges to reducing discrimination and health inequity through existing civil rights laws. Health Affairs, 36(6), 1041-1047.
25. Griffith, R., & Tengnah, C. (2010). Equality and anti- discrimination legislation in health care. British Journal of Community Nursing, 15(3), 130-134.
26. Yamey, G. (2000). Protecting whistleblowers: Employers should respond to the message, not shoot the messenger. BMJ, 320(7227), 70-71.
27. Peate, I. (2023). Protecting whistleblowers. British Journal of Nursing, 32(17).
28. Drew, M., & Garrahan, K. (2005). Whistleblower protection for nurses and other health care professionals. Journal of Nursing Law, 10(2), 79.
29. Vian, T., Agnew MPH, B., & McInnes Jr, K. (2022). Whistleblowing as an anti-corruption strategy in health and pharmaceutical organizations: A scoping review protocol.
30. Jagsi, R., & Lehmann, L. S. (2004). The ethics of medical education. Bmj, 329(7461), 332-334.
31. Klitzman, R. L. (2022). Understanding ethical challenges in medical education research. Academic Medicine, 97(1), 18- 21.
32. AlMahmoud, T., Hashim, M. J., Elzubeir, M. A., & Branicki,F. (2017). Ethics teaching in a medical education environment: preferences for diversity of learning and assessment methods. Medical Education Online, 22(1), 1328257.
33. Brody, E. F. T. B. A. (1995). Medical ethics education: Past,present, and. Acad. Med, 70, 761-769.
34. Gichane, M. W., Griesemer, I., Cubanski, L., Egbuogu, B., McInnes, D. K., & Garvin, L. A. (2025). Increasing diversity, equity, and inclusion in the health and health services research workforce: a systematic scoping review. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 40(7), 1487-1497.
35. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Health and Medicine Division; Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice; Roundtable on the Promotion of Health Equity. Exploring Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Health Equity Commitments and Approaches by Health Organization C-Suites: Proceedings of a Workshop. Martinez RM, Taffe R, Alper J, editors. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2024 Apr 1. PMID: 38718152.
36. Worman, S. (2024). Diversity, equity and inclusiveness in healthcare: A primary care perspective. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 30(8), 1539-1542.
37. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Health and Medicine Division; Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice; Roundtable on the Promotion of Health Equity; Martinez RM, Taffe R, Alper J, editors. Exploring Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Health Equity Commitments and Approaches by Health Organization C-Suites: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2024 Apr 1. 2, The History, Evolution, and Impact of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion and Health Equity in Health Organizations and Systems, Public Health, and Government. Available from: https://www.ncbi. nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK603467/
38. Olatunbosun, C., & Wilby, K. J. (2022). Advocacy as a professional responsibility. Canadian Pharmacists Journal/ Revue des Pharmaciens du Canada, 155(6), 298-301.
39. Garcia, L. B., Hernandez, K. E., & Mata, H. (2015). Professional development through policy advocacy: Communicating and advocating for health and health equity. Health Promotion Practice, 16(2), 162-165.
40. Dobson, S., Voyer, S., & Regehr, G. (2012). Perspective: agency and activism: rethinking health advocacy in the medical profession. Academic Medicine, 87(9), 1161-1164.
41. Gould, T., Louise Fleming, M., & Parker, E. (2012). Advocacy for health: revisiting the role of health promotion. Health Promotion Journal of Australia, 23(3), 165-170.