inner-banner-bg

International Journal of Clinical and Medical Education Research(IJCMER)

ISSN: 2832-7705 | DOI: 10.33140/IJCMER

Impact Factor: 0.93

Research Article - (2024) Volume 3, Issue 5

Assessment of Patient Satisfaction and Associated Factors among Patient Attending Clinical Laboratory at Worabe Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Central Ethiopia

Seid Abrar *, Zuber Hajikelil , Bisrat Fikadu , Nadiya Zinab and Solomon Ashenafi
 
Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, Sciences, Wolkite University, Central Ethiopia, Ethiopia
 
*Corresponding Author: Seid Abrar, Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, Ethiopia

Received Date: Jul 03, 2024 / Accepted Date: Aug 12, 2024 / Published Date: Aug 20, 2024

Copyright: ©©2024 Seid Abrar, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Citation: Abrar, S., Hajikelil, H., Fikadu, B., Zinab, N., Ashenafi, S. (2024). Assessment of Patient Satisfaction and Associated Factors Among Patient Attending Clinical Laboratory at Worabe Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Central Ethiopia, Int J Clin Med Edu Res, 3(5), 01-10.

Abstract

Background: Laboratory testing is essential for identifying complaints, monitoring condition progression, and evaluating treatment effectiveness. Clinical laboratory services are vital in diagnosis and patient management. Client satisfaction is crucial for healthcare effectiveness and improved patient outcomes, yet data on satisfaction with laboratory services at Worabe Comprehensive Specialized Hospital is lacking. This study aims to assess patient satisfaction with these services in 2023.

Method: An institution-based cross-sectional study involved 299 patients, selected through simple random sampling. Data were entered using Epi-Data and analyzed with SPSS version 21 for bivariate and multivariate analysis.

Results: Of the 299 participants, 150 (50.2%) were satisfied with the laboratory services. The overall satisfaction score was 3.7 out of 5 on a Likert scale. The highest satisfaction was reported for the cleanliness of the blood collection area and hospital (mean scores of 4.24 and 4.22). The lowest satisfaction concerned information provided before sample collection, timely receipt of test results, and clarity on when to expect results. Gender (AOR = 1.623) and marital status (AOR = 1.653) were significantly associated with satisfaction.

Conclusion: Patient satisfaction with laboratory services was generally low. Improvement in service provision and staff training is recommended.

Keywords

Patient Satisfaction, Clinical Laboratory Service, Worabe, Ethiopia

Background

Laboratory services in hospitals are crucial for detecting, diagnosing, and treating diseases. These clinical laboratory services provide physicians with vital diagnostic information for various conditions. Satisfaction is not simply a pre-existing condition to be measured but is a judgment formed by individuals based on their specific experiences. It is defined as the extent to which desired goals are met and serves as a key indicator of a healthcare facility’s success [1]. Patient satisfaction reflects the level of contentment patients feel after using a service, highlighting the difference between the expected service and the actual experience from the patient’s perspective [2]. Patient Satisfaction is a subjective, non- quantitative state of mind that occurs when patients’ expectations are met or exceeded [3].

Clinically, patient satisfaction is essential as satisfied patients are more likely to adhere to treatment, engage in their care, continue using medical services, remain with a healthcare provider, and maintain a specific health system [4]. Conversely, dissatisfied patients may experience worse outcomes due to missed appointments, disregarding advice, or failing to follow treatment plans. Customer satisfaction is crucial for improving service quality and is a key input for the International Organization for Standardization [5]. Laboratory procedures produce test results for their customers, and failure to serve them well indicates that the laboratory is not fulfilling its primary function [6].

Patient satisfaction reflects the provider's ability to deliver care that meets patients' expectations and needs. A survey of laboratory services at university hospitals revealed that the highest dissatisfaction rates were related to computerized test requests, reporting turnaround times, and phlebotomy schedules [7]. Another survey at a tertiary care unit found that the mean satisfaction scores were 58.1 for physicians and nurses, and 70.5 for outpatients [8].

Several factors influence patient satisfaction with laboratory services, including access to the laboratory, environmental hygiene, waiting times, patient-provider communication, availability of requested tests, laboratory space, staff attitude and competence, patients' sociolect-demographic characteristics, physical health status, and patients' understanding and expectations of healthcare services. The hospital’s physical appearance and overall environment also significantly impact client satisfaction. [9,10].

In sub-Saharan Africa, quality laboratory services remain a major public health challenge due to poorly designed laboratories, lack of national policy and strategy, insufficient funding, inadequately trained staff, outdated infrastructure and equipment, scarcity of reagents and consumables, limited quality control protocols, inadequate equipment maintenance, and a lack of government standards for laboratory testing [10,11]. A study of 34 health institutions in Ethiopia indicated widespread shortages of supplies and reagents, leading to the inability to perform even basic tests. Maintenance issues, weak referral systems, and the absence of a quality assurance network were also noted [10]. These challenges result in ineffective diagnostics and inappropriate treatments, increasing morbidity and mortality rates. Despite the significance of these issues, no study has yet examined patient satisfaction with clinical laboratory services at Worabe Hospital. This study aims to fill that knowledge gap by assessing the overall level of patient satisfaction and identifying factors that influence the quality of laboratory services.

Materials and Methods

Study Design, Geographic Region and Time Frame

A hospital-based cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted on patients who visit laboratories at WCSH, the primary hospitals serving a substantial population in the Central Ethiopia region, to evaluate patient satisfaction from March to August 2023. WCSH is situated in Worabe town, located in the Central Ethiopia regional state, Silte zone. The town is positioned 170 km from Addis Ababa and 120 km southeast from Wolkite town. As per the 2007 National Housing and Population Census, the anticipated population of Worabe town for the year 2014/15 was approximately 15,920, with an estimated 3249 households. According to the town administration report, the town comprises Six Kebeles [32]. The Zonal administration is bordered in the North by Guragae Zone, in the West by Hadia Zone, in the Southeast by Alaba Special Woreda, and in the East by Oromia Regional State. WCSH offers a range of health services for residents, including childbirth, antenatal and postnatal care, as well as provision of antiretroviral therapy, laboratory services, Tuberculosis/HIV collaborative care, and other routine medical treatments for both outpatient and inpatient individuals.

Source and Study Population

Patients visiting laboratory of WCSH were the source of population. All patients visiting the clinical laboratory of WCSH during the study period would be study population.

Eligibility Criteria

patients aged 18 years and above, or their designated proxies for minors along with caregivers, who were availing laboratory services during the specified study period, were eligible for participation in the survey. Those individuals undergoing microbiology, clinical chemistry, hematology, serology, parasitology, and urine analysis tests were considered as respondents and included in the research. Exclusion criteria encompassed individuals with critical illnesses, mental disorders, or those incapable of providing responses without a designated caretaker present at the time of the study.

Sample Size Determination and Sampling Technique

The sample size was calculated using a single population proportion formula [N = [Zα/2]2 P [1-P] /d2] for estimating a single population proportion for a cross-sectional study. The proportion of patients’ satisfaction is 77% from the previous study conducted in Jimma with 95% confidence level and with a margin of error of 5% and 10% non-respondent rate, sample size will be [N]= [1.96]2 x 0.77[0.23]/ [0.05]2. [n]=272. N= 272. Expected non-respondent rate = 10%. Thus, n= 272 + [10% of 272] =299. Convenience sampling technique was used to recruit these 299 study participants.

Operational Definition

Patient Satisfaction: Patient’s satisfaction towards clinical laboratory service is measured by different parameters. The parameters include cleanliness of the hospital, cleanliness and comfort of waiting area, availability of laboratory staff on working hours, friendliness of staff, location of the laboratory in the hospital, latrine accessibility and availability, latrine cleanliness and comfort, the cost of laboratory service.

Satisfied: In overall satisfaction, patients are said to be satisfied when the result of their mean score is above or equal to the mean score.

Dissatisfied: In overall satisfaction patients are said to be dissatisfied when the result of their mean score is less than the mean score.

Data Collection Procedure

Data was collected from patients by conducting face-to-face interviews at the exit of the laboratory using a pre-tested and structured interviewer-administered questionnaire. The translated Patients’ Satisfaction Questionnaire in ‘Amharic’ was used to guide the researcher. Standardized 5-point Likert scales ranging from very dissatisfied to very satisfied [1 to 5 points] were used to measure satisfaction status for all items. The standard questionnaire was pee-tested before the collection of entire data patients who receive service from the laboratory were interviewed in WCSH. These patients were not included in the sample size. The questionnaire was prepared in English and translated to Amharic, then back to English to check for its consistency. The questionnaire consists of satisfaction indicators, sociolect-demographic characteristics of the patients and different laboratory services such as waiting time [turnaround time], availability of requested laboratory tests, the convenience of service hours, and type of laboratory visit, privacy, respect, courtesy, and confidentiality. Beside their sociolect-demographic characteristics, the study participant was asked to rate each aspect of the laboratory service on a five-point liker scale [1= Very Dissatisfied, 2= Dissatisfied, 3= Neutral, 4= Satisfied, 5= Very satisfied].

Data management and Quality Assurance

All questionnaires for the study were returned daily to us for data cleaning, data editing and data entry. The questionnaire was originally be prepared in English and its final version was translated into Amharic, and then back-translated to English to check its consistency. Moreover, the pretest of the questionnaire was carried out on 5% of total sample size and each data collector had an opportunity to be acquainted with the interview technique. Furthermore, intensive supervision was done by research advisors throughout the data collection period. The researcher collected the completed questionnaire and checked each for inconsistencies, error, and omissions. Double entry of the questionnaire was carried out to minimize entry errors.

Data Processing and Analysis

Quantitative data was entered, cleaned, coded, and data analysis was made using SPSS for windows version 21 & Epi information. Associations of the variables were computed using the chi-square and were interpreted based on the finding of the response. Interpretation at P < 0.05 using 95% confidence intervals was done for statistical significance. Normality was checked for continuous variables using histogram. Socio-demographic and economic factors were treated as categorical variables and were presented as frequencies and percentage. A Chi-square test was applied to test the association between explanatory variable and outcome variable. Furthermore, both bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were employed to identify the candidate variables and contributing factors of patient satisfaction respectively. Bivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify the candidate variable between one explanatory variable and outcome variable at p values ≤ 0.25. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to predict factors which effect of patient satisfaction for the candidate variable, which had association during bivariate logistic regression. Those variables with a p-value less than 0.05 AOR at 95% confidence interval was considered statistically significant factors.

Results

Socio-Demographic Characteristics of the Participants

A total of 299 patients were enrolled in the study. The mean age of study participant was 34.79 ±10.439 [[mean ± SD]. Besides, [33.8%] of the participants were within the age group range of 29-40 years, more than half [56.2%] of the study participants were male and out of 299 participants [67.2%] of the participants were married. Regarding educational status of study participant, the majority 129[43.1%] are under secondary school and [7.4%] are only read and write.

Variables

Categories

Frequency (n=299) (%)

Age

18-28

98(32.8)

29-40

101(33.8)

41-49

75(25.1)

>50

25(8.4)

Mean age+SD(yr.)

34.79+10.439

Sex

Male

168(56.2)

Female

131(43.8)

Level of education

Only read and write

22(7.4)

Primary (1-8)

70(23.4)

Secondary (9-12)

129(43.1)

College and above

78(26.1)

Marital status

Single1

99(33.1)

Married

200(66.9)

Monthly income

1000-2500

119(39.8)

2500-3500

80(26.8)

>3500

100(33.4)

Table 1: Socio-Demographic Characteristics of Hospital Aboratory Service Users at Worabe Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Worabe, Ethiopia, July 2023

Single 1; includes divorced, separated and, widowed/widower

Patients’ Satisfaction Level with Laboratory Service

The overall patient satisfaction on laboratory service was determined by taking mean score and above for 18 variables that were utilized to reflect satisfaction [displayed in Table 2]. Accordingly, of 299 respondents, just over half [50.2%] of them were satisfied and the rest were dissatisfied [49.8] with general clinical laboratory service provided at WCSH [Figure 1].

In Likert scale, the overall mean rate of satisfaction of patients by laboratory services in WCSH was 3.49. The mean rate of satisfaction for different aspects of laboratory service ranged from 2.87 to 4.22. The lowest mean rating of satisfaction was given for information given before specimen collection outside laboratory room and test results received on time as told with mean ratings of 2.87 and 3.02, respectively. Highest mean rating of satisfaction was obtained for cleanliness of the hospital [4.22] and laboratory personnel’s professional appearance [neatness, professional dressing] [4.21].

Variable

Very dissatisfied

Dissatisfied

Moderate satisfied

Satisfied

Very satisfied

Mean

+SD

NO

%

NO

%

NO

%

NO

%

NO

%

Location of the

laboratory in the hospital

17

5.7

27

9.0

9

3.0

16

3

 

54.

5

83

27.

8

3.90+1.0

83

Cleanliness of the hospital

4

1.3

8

2.7

4

1.3

18

6

 

62.

2

97

32.

4

4.22+0.7

21

Cleanness and comfort of waiting area

7

2.3

18

6.0

4

1.3

17

9

 

59.

9

91

30.

4

4.10+0.8

73

Adequacy of sitting

arrangement in waiting area

13

4.3

47

15.7

11

3.7

15

5

 

51.

8

73

24.

4

3.76+1.1

17

Availability of laboratory staff on working hours

13

4.3

43

14.4

5

1.7

16

0

 

53.

5

78

26.

1

3.83+1.1

04

Welcoming approach or friendliness of Staff

21

7.0

32

10.7

10

3.3

16

3

 

54.

5

73

24.

4

3.79+1.3

9

Laboratory personnel’s professional appearance

3

1.0

11

3.7

12

4.0

16

7

 

55.

9

 

106

35.

5

4.21+0.7

68

Respect and courtesy of the staff

16

5.4

50

16.7

6

2.0

13

2

 

44.

1

95

31.

8

3.80+1.2

06

Cleanliness of the blood drawing area

2

0.7

13

4.3

4

1.3

17

2

 

57.

5

 

108

36.

1

4.24+0.7

43

Ability of person drawing blood to put client at ease

5

1.7

33

11.0

10

3.3

16

5

 

55.

2

86

28.

8

3.98+0.9

57

Information given before specimen collection

outside the laboratory

room

54

18.1

98

32.8

12

4.0

10

4

 

34.

8

31

10.

4

2.87+1.3

42

Latrine accessibility and availability

28

9.4

34

11.4

45

15.1

12

9

 

43.

1

63

 

21.

1

3.55+1.2

10

Latrine cleanness and comfort

30

10.0

25

8.4

47

15.7

12

4

 

41.

5

73

24.

4

3.62+1.2

24

Completeness of information on how and

when to receive

laboratory results

28

9.4

70

23.4

8

2.7

14

9

 

49.

8

44

14.

7

3.37+1.2

50

Ability of the laboratory personnel to answer Questions

24

8.0

57

19.1

7

2.3

17

5

 

58.

5

36

12.

0

3.47+1.1

65

Maintaining privacy

and confidentiality

9

3.0

9

3.0

73

24.4

12

6

 

42.

82

27.

4

3.88+0.9

48

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

The cost of laboratory service

13

4.3

31

10.4

102

34.1

11

6

 

38.

8

37

12.

4

3.44+0.9

83

Test results received on time as told

42

14.0

81

27.1

36

12.0

10

5

 

35.

1

35

11.

7

3.03+1.2

87

Table 2: Rate of patients’ Satisfaction Determined by Mean Score of Responses to Different Satisfaction Questions by Patients of WCSH, Worabe, Ethiopia, July 2023

Factors Affecting the Level of Patients’ Satisfaction Towards Clinical Laboratory Services

Several demographics and general services related factors such as: -age, sex, educational status, income, and marital status of respondent were tested using binary logistic regression for the presence of association with laboratory service satisfaction. Variables like age, sex, and marital status of respondent were found to be significantly associated with patient satisfaction on clinical laboratory services. [Table-3]

Variables

Categories

Satisfaction level

Chi-square(p-value)

Satisfied     No

(%)

Dissatisfied

No (%)

Age

18-28

53 (35.3)

46 (30.9)

 

 

8.498(0.037)*

29-40

44 (29.3)

57 (38.3)

41-49

35 (23.3)

40 (26.8)

>50

6(4.0)

18 (12.0)

Sex

Male

75 (50.0)

93 (62.4)

4.681(0.030)

*

Female

75 (50.0)

56 (37.6)

Level            of education

Only read and write

15 (10.0)

7 (4.7)

 

 

 

3.193(0.363)

Primary (1-8)

33 (22.0)

37 (24.8)

Secondary (9-12)

64 (42.7)

65 (43.6)

College and above

38 (25.3)

40 (26.8)

Marital status

Single

41 (27.3)

58 (38.9)

 

 

 

4.536(0.033)*

Married

109 (72.7)

91 (61.1)

Monthly income

1000-2500

61 (40.7)

58 (38.9)

 

3.832(0.147)

2500-3500

34 (22.8)

46(30.7)

>3500

43(28.7)

57(58.3)

N.B -P-value <0.05 and * indicates those with significant association

Table 3: Chi-Square Analysis for Predictors of Patients’ Satisfaction Towards Clinical Laboratory Service in WCSH, Ethiopia, 2023 [n = 299]

These factors were further analyzed using multiple logistic regression using enter stepwise elimination method. The result of multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that females are 1.623 times satisfied than male [AOR=1.623, 95%CI: 1.020-2.581]. From patients receiving laboratory service married patients are 3.3 times more likely satisfied than single [AOR=1.653, 95%CI: 1.012-2.701]. However, other factors such as level of education, age, and monthly income were not significantly associated with patient satisfaction towards clinical laboratory service [Table 3]

Variables

Categories

Satisfaction level

COR (95% CI)

P-

value

AOR (95% CI)

P-

value

Satisfied No (%)

Dissatisfie d No (%)

Age

18-28

53 (35.3)

46 (30.9)

1

 

1

 

29-40

44 (29.3)

57 (38.3)

0.67(0.384-

1.170)

0.159*

0.61(0.347-

1.089)

0.095

41-49

35 (23.3)

40 (26.8)

0.76(0.416-

1.386)

0.370

0.66(0.361-

1.242)

0.203

>50

6(4.0)

18 (12.0)

2.6(0.953-7.112)

0.062*

2.33(0.837-

6.506)

0.105

Sex

Male

75 (50.0)

93 (62.4)

1

 

1

 

Female

75 (50.0)

56 (37.6)

1.66(1.048-

2.633)

0.031*

1.62(1.020-

2.581)

0.041

**

Level     of education

Only read

and write

15 (10.0)

7 (4.7)

1

 

1

 

Primary

(1-8)

33 (22.0)

37 (24.8)

2.256(0.829-

6.138)

0.111*

0.379(0.132-

1.086)

0.071

Secondary

64 (42.7)

65 (43.6)

0.939(0.492-

1.791)

0.848

0.447(0.165-

1.210)

0.113

College

and above

38 (25.3)

40 (26.8)

1.036(0.591-

1.819)

0.901

0.479(0.169-

1.359)

0.167

Marital status

Single

41 (27.3)

58 (38.9)

1

 

1

 

Married

109(72.7)

91 (61.1)

1.694(1.041-

2.758)

0.034*

1.653(1.012-

2.701)

0.045

**

Monthly income

1000-2500

61 (40.7)

58 (38.9)

1

 

1

 

2500-3500

34 (22.8)

46(30.7)

1.286(0.727-

0.387

1.318(0741-

0.526

 

 

 

 

2.276)

 

2.344)

 

>3500

43(28.7)

57(58.3)

0.717(0.420-

1.224)

0.223*

1.628(0.866-

3.063)

0.192

Key * = candidate variables at p ≤0.25 in bi-variate logistic regression, ** predictor variables in multivariate logistic regression at p <0.05 and1 refers to reference group.

Table 4: Predictors of Satisfaction Towards Clinical Laboratory Service in WCSH, Ethiopia, 2023 [n = 299]

Discussion

Clinical laboratories cater to a diverse clientele including patients, physicians, public health agencies, and the broader community. Evaluating the satisfaction levels of patients can offer valuable insights into their concerns regarding the services provided, enabling us to address any issues that may arise. This study aimed to gauge patient satisfaction levels and identify potential factors associated with laboratory services at WCSH. The findings of this study indicated that the overall satisfaction rate among patients availing themselves of clinical laboratory services at WCSH in Worabe city stood at 50.2% [95% CI: 44.1-55.2]. This figure closely aligns with the results from a similar study conducted in Amhara North West Ethiopia, which reported a satisfaction rate of 52.6% pertaining to the quality of malaria diagnostic services. [24] which assessed satisfaction with malaria diagnostic services, and in Debre Markos Referral Hospital [48.3%] [25]. However, satisfaction levels at WCSH were slightly lower than those reported at Tikur Anbessa Hospital in Addis Ababa [59.7%] [26], ART clinics in Addis Ababa [85.5%], and three selected hospitals in Eastern Ethiopia [87.6%] [27]. This variation might be influenced by social desirability bias, as patients may have been hesitant to express dissatisfaction during interviews conducted within the hospital. Additionally, WCSH is a relatively new facility, and its services may not yet fully meet patient expectations. When comparing satisfaction rates using a 5-point Likert scale, the overall mean satisfaction score at WCSH was 3.7. Specifically, patients gave the lowest ratings to the timeliness of receiving test results [3.02 ± 1.287] and the information provided before specimen collection [2.87 ± 1.342]. On the other hand, the cleanliness of the waiting area, adequacy of seating, and cleanliness of the blood drawing area received the highest ratings. Interestingly, a study from Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital found that patients were most satisfied with the cost of laboratory services [4.12 ± 1.08], while cleanliness of the latrine was a common concern [26].

The satisfaction scores in this study ranged higher than those from a study at Nekemte Hospital, Western Ethiopia, where scores ranged from 2.15 to 3.82 [28]. However, they were lower compared to a study conducted at selected government hospitals in Eastern Ethiopia [29]. Notably, the highest satisfaction scores in this study were similar to those from Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital, where scores ranged from 3.05 [± 1.12] to 4.12 [± 1.08] out of five [26]. The variation in satisfaction levels might be due to better availability of clinical laboratory services, including a wider range of tests, and differences in sociolect-economic status across facilities. Patient satisfaction is a critical outcome measure for healthcare services and serves as an essential tool for quality improvement in clinical laboratories. Identifying the factors associated with satisfaction can help healthcare managers design effective interventions. This study found significant associations between certain factors and patient satisfaction. For instance, females were 1.827 times more likely to be satisfied than males [AOR = 1.827, 95% CI: 1.137-2.935]. Additionally, patients aged over 50 years were 3.3 times more likely to be satisfied compared to younger age groups [AOR = 3.3, 95% CI: 1.144-9.657]. These findings align with a Tanzanian study that also found significant dissatisfaction with both public and private laboratory services [30].

Conversely, other sociolect-demographic factors, such as age group, sex, marital status, and occupation, did not show any statistically significant association with overall patient satisfaction in this study. These findings are consistent with studies conducted in Nekemte, Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital, and Eastern Ethiopia. [31]. However, the study did find that patients with a secondary education were less likely to be satisfied with laboratory services compared to those who could only read and write. This suggests that more educated patients may have higher expectations and be more aware of service quality issues. A similar observation was made in a Tanzanian study, where higher-educated patients were more likely to express dissatisfaction with aspects such as privacy, waiting time, and result notification [30]. In contrast, other studies, such as those by Mindaye T. and Taye B., reported no significant association between educational status and overall satisfaction, possibly due to differences in study focus, particularly those examining only ART patients [27].

Conclusion

There were differences in the levels of satisfaction of patients among the clinical laboratory services in the study hospital. Assessing patient satisfaction is effective and important ways for evaluating health services including clinical laboratory services. In this study the overall level of patients’ satisfaction with laboratory service in WCSH was not satisfactory. There was a lower satisfaction rate observed with time spent waiting to get the laboratory result and information given before specimen collection outside laboratory room. More over cleanliness of the blood drawing area, cleanness and comfort of waiting area and cleanliness of the hospital have high patient satisfaction. Therefore; hospital administration and the laboratory department of each Hospitals should strive more to enhance patients’ satisfaction.

Funding Statement

This research work was supported by Wolkite University College medicine and health science research and Innovation Directorate Office with no specified grant number.

References

  1. Carr-Hill,  R. A.  (1992).  The  measurement  of  patient satisfaction. Journal of public health, 14(3), 236-249.
  2. Donabedian, A. (2002). An introduction to quality assurance in health care. Oxford University Press.
  3. Westaway, M. S., Rheeder, P., Van Zyl, D. G., & Seager, J. R. (2003). Interpersonal and organizational dimensions of patient satisfaction: the moderating effects of health status. International journal for quality in health care, 15(4), 337-344.
  4. Worku, M., & Loha, E. (2017). Assessment of client satisfaction on emergency department services in Hawassa University Referral Hospital, Hawassa, Southern Ethiopia. BMC emergency medicine, 17, 1-5.
  5. Manzoor, F., Wei, L., Hussain, A., Asif, M., & Shah, S. I.A. (2019). Patient satisfaction with health care services; an application of physician’s behavior as a moderator. International journal of environmental research and public health, 16(18), 3318.
  6. Marquis, M. S., Davies, A. R., & Ware Jr, J. E. (1983). Patient satisfaction and change in medical care provider: a longitudinal study. Medical Care, 21(8), 821-829.
  7. Abrar, S. A., Hajikelil, Z., Fikadu, B., Zinab, N., & Ashenafi,S. Assessment of Patient Satisfaction and Associated Factors Among Patient Attending Clinical Laboratory at Worabe Comprenhesive Specialized Hospital, Central Ethiopia. Central Ethiopia.
  8. Lundberg, G. D. (1998). The need for an outcomes research agenda for clinical laboratory testing. JAMA, 280(6), 565-566.
  9. Petti, C. A., Polage, C. R., Quinn, T. C., Ronald, A. R., & Sande, M. A. (2006). Laboratory medicine in Africa: a barrier to effective health care. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 42(3), 377-382.
  10. Belete, T., Meless, H., Kassu, A., Tesema, D., Gezahegn, N., Tamene, W., ... & Messele, T. (2004). Laboratory services in hospitals and regional laboratories in Ethiopia. The Ethiopian Journal of Health Development, 18(1).
  11. Oja, P. I., Kouri, T. T., & Pakarinen,A. J. (2006). From customer satisfaction survey to corrective actions in laboratory services in a university hospital. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 18(6), 422-428.
  12. Koh, Y. R., Kim, S. Y., Kim, I. S., Chang, C. L., Lee, E. Y.,Son, H. C., & Kim, H. H. (2014). Customer satisfaction survey with clinical laboratory and phlebotomy services at a tertiary care unit level. Annals of laboratory medicine, 34(5), 380.
  13. Carter, J. Y. (1999). Role of laboratory services in health care: the present status in Eastern Africa and recommendations for the future. East African medical journal, 76(5).
  14. Mohan, D. R., & Kumar, K. S. (2011). A study on the satisfaction of patients with reference to hospital services. Int J Bus Econ Manag Res, 1(3), 15-25.
  15. Evans, M. R., Meldrum, R., Lane, W., Gardner, D., Ribeiro, C. D., Gallimore, C. I., & Westmoreland, D. (2002). An outbreak of viral gastroenteritis following environmental contamination at a concert hall. Epidemiology & Infection, 129(2), 355-360.
  16. Almatrafi, D., Altaweel, N., Abdelfattah, M., Alqazlan, M., Darrar, H., Alomari, A., ... & Alsulami, M. (2018). Assessment of customer satisfaction with the clinical laboratory services provided in King Abdullah Medical City, Makkah. The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine, 70(11), 2029-2037.
  17. Bogale, A. L., Kassa, H. B., & Ali, J. H. (2015). Patients’ perception and satisfaction on quality of laboratory malaria diagnostic service in Amhara Regional State, North West Ethiopia. Malaria journal, 14, 1-7.
  18. Abera, R. G., Abota, B. A., Legese, M. H., & Negesso, A. E. (2017). Patient satisfaction with clinical laboratory services at Tikur Anbessa specialized hospital, Addis Ababa, ethiopia. Patient preference and adherence, 1181-1188.
  19. Belay, M., Abrar, S., Bekele, D., Daka, D., Derbe, M., & Birhaneselassie, M. (2013). HIV⁄ AIDS Patients’ satisfaction on ART laboratory service in selected governmental hospitals, Sidamma Zone, southern Ethiopia. Sci J Public Health, 1, 85.
  20. Tadele, G., Ejeta, E., Desalegn, M., Abere, S., & Elias, K. (2014). Patients satisfaction on clinical laboratory services at Nekemte Referral Hospital, Oromia, Ethiopia. Food Science and Quality Management, 30, 25-30.
  21. Woldeyohanes, T. R., Woldehaimanot, T. E., Kerie, M. W., Mengistie, M. A., & Yesuf, E. A. (2015). Perceived patient satisfaction with in-patient services at Jimma University Specialized Hospital, Southwest Ethiopia. BMC research notes, 8, 1-8.
  22. Hall, J. A., & Dornan, M. C. (1988). Meta-analysis of satisfaction with medical care: description of research domain and analysis of overall satisfaction levels. Social science & medicine, 27(6), 637-644.
  23. Mfinanga, S. G., Kahwa, A., Kimaro, G., Kilale, A., Kivuyo, S., Senkoro, M., ... & Mashoto, K. (2008). Patient's dissatisfaction with the public and private laboratory services in conducting HIV related testing in Tanzania. BMC Health services research, 8, 1-5.
  24. Bogale, A. L., Kassa, H. B., & Ali, J. H. (2015). Patients’ perception and satisfaction on quality of laboratory malaria diagnostic service in Amhara Regional State, North West Ethiopia. Malaria journal, 14, 1-7.
  25. Alelign, A., & Belay, Y. A. (2019). Patient satisfaction with clinical laboratory services and associated factors among adult patients attending outpatient departments at Debre Markos referral hospital, Northwest Ethiopia. BMC research notes, 12, 1-6.
  26. Abera, R. G., Abota, B. A., Legese, M. H., & Negesso, A. E. (2017). Patient satisfaction with clinical laboratory services at Tikur Anbessa specialized hospital, Addis Ababa, ethiopia. Patient preference and adherence, 1181-1188.
  27. Mindaye, T., & Taye, B. (2012). Patients satisfaction with laboratory services at antiretroviral therapy clinics in public hospitals, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. BMC research notes, 5, 1-7.
  28. Tadele, G., Ejeta, E., Desalegn, M., Abere, S., & Elias, K.(2014). Patients satisfaction on clinical laboratory services at Nekemte Referral Hospital, Oromia, Ethiopia. Food Science and Quality Management, 30, 25-30.
  29. Teklemariam, Z., Mekonnen, A., Kedir, H., & Kabew, G. (2013). Clients and clinician satisfaction with laboratory services at selected government hospitals in eastern Ethiopia. BMC research notes, 6, 1-7.
  30. Mfinanga, S. G., Kahwa, A., Kimaro, G., Kilale, A., Kivuyo, S., Senkoro, M., ... & Mashoto, K. (2008). Patient's dissatisfaction with the public and private laboratory services in conducting HIV related testing in Tanzania. BMC Health services research, 8, 1-5.
  31. Teklemariam, Z., Mekonnen, A., Kedir, H., & Kabew, G. (2013). Clients and clinician satisfaction with laboratory services at selected government hospitals in eastern Ethiopia. BMC research notes, 6, 1-7.
  32. Bedaso, A., Yeneabat, T., Yohannis, Z., Bedasso, K., & Feyera,F. (2016). Community attitude and associated factors towards people with mental illness among residents of Worabe Town, Silte Zone, southern nation’s nationalities and people’s region, Ethiopia. PloS one, 11(3), e0149429.