inner-banner-bg

Journal of Clinical Review & Case Reports(JCRC)

ISSN: 2573-9565 | DOI: 10.33140/JCRC

Impact Factor: 1.823

Laparoscopic Entry via the DE-ALWIS METHOD

Abstract

Alwis Seneviratne

Despite the rapid advances in laparoscopic surgery in the past 2 decades the initial entry still accounts for approximately 40% to 50% of laparoscopic complications and should be considered the most dangerous step of a laparoscopic procedure. In this review, the authors share a technique for initial umbilical entry, and provide alternative entry sites in cases where umbilical entry is comtraindicated. Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 2(3):193-198 doi; 10.3909/riog0088. Laparoscopy for diagnostic purposes to a modality for minor and major surgical procedures, had been advancing rapidly over the last 3 decades. The initial entry still accounts for about 40-50% of laparoscopic complications and is the most dangerous step of this surgical procedure [1, 2]. Laparoscopic entry using a veres needle followed by a blind insertion of a sharp trocar is the common method used by gynaecologists [3-5]. There is no concensious as to which laparascopic entry is superior and the common recommendation is use the entry methods with which the surgeons feel comfortable [6]. Umbilical entry is not suitable in certain instances, such as previous midline abdominal incision, previous umbilical hernia surgery, previous pelvic peritonitis and so forth, due to the presence of pelvic adhesions. An open surgery does not guarantee against a visceral injury [7].

PDF