inner-banner-bg

Archives of Epidemiology & Public Health Research(AEPHR)

ISSN: 2833-4353 | DOI: 10.33140/AEPHR

Impact Factor: 1.98

Perspective Article - (2025) Volume 4, Issue 3

From Elitism to Equity: How Indonesia’s 2024 Healthcare Reform Ignited a Global Movement for Medical Justice

Prof. Dasaad Mulijono 1,2,3 *
 
1Department of Cardiology, Bethsaida Hospital, Tangerang, Indonesia
2Indonesian College of Lifestyle Medicine, Indonesia
3Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Prima University, Medan, Indonesia
 
*Corresponding Author: Prof. Dasaad Mulijono, Department of Cardiology, Bethsaida Hospital, Tangerang, Indonesia Prof. Dasaad Mulijono, Indonesian College of Lifestyle Medicine, Indonesia Prof. Dasaad Mulijono, Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Prima University, Medan, Indonesia

Received Date: Sep 03, 2025 / Accepted Date: Oct 17, 2025 / Published Date: Oct 22, 2025

Copyright: ©©2025 Prof. Dasaad Mulijono. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Citation: Mulijono, D. (2025). From Elitism to Equity: How Indonesiaâ??s 2024 Healthcare Reform Ignited a Global Movement for Medical Justice. Arch Epidemiol Pub Health Res, 4(3), 01-05.

Abstract

In an era when medical systems worldwide face crises of trust, rising costs, and growing inequity, Indonesia’s 2024 healthcare reform emerges as a bold and inspiring blueprint for transformation. For decades, the country’s medical education and professional advancement pathways were clouded by opaque governance, entrenched elitism, and systemic exclusion—factors that disproportionately affected qualified candidates from marginalized and underrepresented backgrounds. Yet, these structural flaws did not reflect the moral compass of the nation’s physicians, many of whom tirelessly upheld their professional oath despite institutional obstacles.

The 2024 legislative breakthrough—marked by the Indonesian government’s decision to decentralize medical authority, establish independent collegia, and open pathways for merit-based medical training and certification—signals a seismic shift. This reform does not aim to punish, but to heal: it seeks to dismantle long-standing barriers, reaffirm the core values of justice and compassion in medicine, and ensure that every aspiring doctor is evaluated by ability, not privilege. More than a domestic achievement, Indonesia’s reform story challenges global health leaders to reflect: are our systems genuinely meritocratic, or are they silently perpetuating social stratification under the guise of tradition and prestige? This article contends that Indonesia’s movement is not merely administrative—it is moral, ethical, and philosophical. As nations seek models of sustainable and just healthcare, Indonesia may well be the unexpected catalyst of a new global standard—one where merit, ethics, and equity form the proper foundation of medical excellence.

Keywords

Medical Education, Bullying, Discrimination, Reform, Psychological Impact, Career Development, Innovation, Healthcare Equity, Indonesia

Introduction

Medical education in Indonesia, like in many developing coun- tries, has long contended with systemic issues—among them limited transparency, unequal access to opportunities, and insti- tutional inertia. These challenges have disproportionately affected students from underrepresented, rural, or economically disadvan- taged communities, limiting the diversity and equity of the medical workforce [1–4]. While not caused by individuals alone, the cumulative effect of these issues has been deeply felt across gener- ations of aspiring physicians.

This article aims to examine these historical challenges and high- light Indonesia’s recent reforms—not to criticize, but to promote understanding, healing, and hope. The goal is not condemnation, but transformation, as Indonesia embarks on a journey to ensure that every capable student can pursue a career in medicine and ev- ery patient can trust in a just and ethical healthcare system.

Recognizing Past Challenges, Honouring Future Possibilities

A History of Systemic Barriers

In past decades, access to medical education and specialization in Indonesia was sometimes influenced by non-academic factors, such as family connections or financial means. These patterns were never official policies, nor were they reflective of the values held by the majority of doctors and educators. However, their pres- ence limited opportunities for many qualified individuals and often created unspoken hurdles for students from modest or minority backgrounds.

The Human Cost of Structural Injustice

The actual impact of these systemic issues is evident in the lives of students whose dreams were quietly extinguished—not because they lacked dedication or brilliance—but because the system was not designed to fully recognize their potential. The effects were both psychological and professional, including low self-worth, re- duced confidence, and stalled careers [5–18]. Many chose to leave the system or pursue careers abroad, where meritocratic systems allowed them to thrive.

Innovation Delayed, Not Denied

Exclusion has consequences not only for individuals but for na- tional progress. When innovation is suppressed by structural bias, the entire healthcare system suffers. It loses fresh ideas, diverse perspectives, and creative breakthroughs. Reforms are therefore not only ethical necessities—they are strategic investments in na- tional advancement.

2024: A Turning Point in Indonesian Healthcare

Indonesia’s legislative reforms in 2024—spearheaded by the Min- istry of Health—represent a bold step forward. Independent colle- gia, merit-based admissions, and the re-inclusion of internationally trained Indonesian doctors are among the key changes that signal a commitment to fairness and excellence. These efforts do not aim to discredit existing professionals but to raise the system to a new standard of inclusivity, ethics, and global competitiveness.

These reforms are long-awaited and widely welcomed, partic- ularly by younger generations of physicians eager to contribute without fear of bias or exclusion. Importantly, they have provided platforms for previously unheard voices, including those who had faced obstacles in earlier systems [19-26].

A Personal Reflection on Change and Resilience

As someone who once experienced professional exclusion due to systemic limitations, I speak not with resentment, but with deep gratitude for the opportunity to now contribute meaningfully to Indonesia’s medical advancement. At Bethsaida Hospital, I was fortunate to work in an environment that valued both merit and compassion. There, we pioneered a whole-food plant-based life- style medicine program that reversed chronic diseases, reduced restenosis rates, and helped thousands, including elderly patients, during the COVID-19 pandemic.

These outcomes would not have been possible without a culture shift—away from hierarchy and toward healing, innovation, and service. They show that when systems change, lives change.

Constructive Solutions Toward a Healthier System

To build upon the foundation laid in 2024, several actionable strategies are essential:

Legal Protections and Reporting Mechanisms: Victims of bullying or exclusion must have access to secure reporting channels, supported by the government and backed by institutional safeguards [27-32].

AI-Driven Selection Processes: Technology can help ensure fairer admission processes, free from unconscious bias and favouritism [33–39].

Mental Health and Career Support: Counselling and mentorship programs should be integrated into universities and hospitals to support those affected by past or present exclusion [40–42].

Leadership and Cultural Change: Institutional leaders must actively promote a zero-tolerance stance on discrimination and cultivate cultures of empathy, accountability, and opportunity for all [1,6,43–51].

A Message to the Global Medical Community

Indonesia’s journey is not unique. Similar challenges exist across many countries, both developed and developing. What sets Indo- nesia apart is the courage to act, to reform, and to admit that the Hippocratic Oath must be protected not only in words, but in institutional design.

To all medical professionals worldwide: let us not remain silent when systems exclude, marginalize, or discourage excellence. We are stewards of not just health, but hope. Let us rise together in solidarity to ensure that the profession of medicine always reflects the nobility of its mission.

Conclusion

Indonesia’s reforms in 2024 are more than a policy shift—they are a moral and professional awakening. By promoting equity, dis- mantling barriers, and valuing merit and compassion, the country is forging a new era of medical education and clinical practice. These changes honour both the dignity of the profession and the dreams of those who seek to serve through it.

To Indonesian doctors—past, present, and future—this is not a judgment, but a tribute. A tribute to those who endured, those who spoke out, and those who continue to heal with integrity. May this era of transformation uplift us all, within Indonesia and beyond.

References

  1. Alvarez Villalobos, N. A., De León Gutiérrez, H., Ruiz Hernandez, F. G., Elizondo Omaña, G. G., Vaquera Alfaro,H. A., & Carranza Guzmán, F. J. (2023). Prevalence and associated factors of bullying in medical residents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of occupational health, 65(1), e12418.
  2. Yosep, I., Fitria, N., Mardhiyah, A., Pahria, T., Yamin, A., & Hikmat, R. (2024). Experiences of bullying among nursing students during clinical practice: a scoping review of qualitative studies. BMC nursing, 23(1), 832.
  3. Fine, S. L., Pinandari, A. W., Muzir, S. M., Agnesia, L.,Novitasari, P. I., Bass, J. K., ... & Mmari, K. (2023). “If it’s really excessive, it can enter your heart”: A Mixed Methods Investigation of Bullying Among Early Adolescents in Semarang, Indonesia. Journal of interpersonal violence, 38(3- 4), 4088-4113.
  4. Hikmat, R., Suryani, S., Yosep, I., & Jeharsae, R. (2024).RETRACTED ARTICLE: KiVa anti-bullying program: preventing and reducing bullying behavior among students–a scoping review. BMC Public Health, 24(1), 2923.
  5. Rivara, F., & Le Menestrel, S. (2014). Committee on the Biological and Psychosocial Effects of Peer Victimization: Lessons for Bullying Prevention. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Washington (DC).
  6. Waseem, M., & Nickerson, A. B. (2023). Identifying and addressing bullying. In StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing.
  7. Wolke, D., & Lereya, S. T. (2015). Long-term effects of bullying. Archives of disease in childhood, 100(9), 879-885.
  8. Beran, T., Stanton, L., Hetherington, R., Mishna, F., & Shariff,S. (2012). Development of the bullying and health experiences scale. Interactive journal of medical research, 1(2), e1835.
  9. Ikhlaq, H., Agarwal, S., Kwok, C., Golamgouse, H., Derby, S., McRae, N., ... & Kumar, S. (2023). Medical students impacted by discrimination: a qualitative study into their experiences of belonging and support systems at medical schools in the UK. BMJ open, 13(12), e078314.
  10. Nguyen, M., Chaudhry, S. I., Desai, M. M., Chen, C., McDade,W. A., Fancher, T. L., & Boatright, D. (2022). Association of mistreatment and discrimination with medical school attrition. JAMA pediatrics, 176(9), 935-937.
  11. Togioka, B., & Young, E. (2024). Diversity and discrimination in health care. StatPearls.
  12. Teshome, B. G., Desai, M. M., Gross, C. P., Hill, K. A., Li, F., Samuels, E. A., ... & Boatright, D. H. (2022). Marginalized identities, mistreatment, discrimination, and burnout among US medical students: cross sectional survey and retrospective cohort study. Bmj, 376.
  13. Perry, S. P., Hardeman, R., Burke, S. E., Cunningham, B., Burgess, D. J., & van Ryn, M. (2016). The impact of everyday discrimination and racial identity centrality on African American medical student well-being: a report from the medical student CHANGE study. Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities, 3(3), 519-526.
  14. Ng, L., Lin, C., & Henning, M. A. (2020). A narrative review of discrimination experienced by medical students. Medical Science Educator, 30(1), 577-584.
  15. Szafran, O., Woloschuk, W., Torti, J. M., & Palacios Mackay,M. F. (2021). Intimidation, harassment, and discrimination during family medicine residency training: a mixed methods study. BMC medical education, 21(1), 173.
  16. Gianakos, A. L., Freischlag, J. A., Mercurio, A. M., Haring,R. S., LaPorte, D. M., Mulcahey, M. K., ... & Kennedy, J.G. (2022). Bullying, discrimination, harassment, sexual harassment, and the fear of retaliation during surgical residency training: a systematic review. World journal of surgery, 46(7), 1587-1599.
  17. Sotto-Santiago, S., Mac, J., Slaven, J., & Maldonado, M. (2021). A survey of internal medicine residents: their learning environments, bias and discrimination experiences, and their support structures. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 697-703.
  18. Santen, S. A., Davis, K. R., Brady, D. W., & Hemphill, R. R.(2010). Potentially discriminatory questions during residency interviews: frequency and effects on residents' ranking of programs in the national resident matching program. Journal of graduate medical education, 2(3), 336-340.
  19. Tambunan, D. (2023). Indonesia under threat: The danger of corruption to political legitimacy. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 8(1), 112-140.
  20. Alfada, A. (2019). The destructive effect of corruption on economic growth in Indonesia: A threshold model. Heliyon, 5(10).
  21. Silitonga, M. S., Wittek, R., Snijders, T. A., & Heyse, L. (2023). Democratizing corruption: a role structure analysis of Indonesia’s “Big Bang” decentralization. Applied Network Science, 8(1), 8.
  22. Asa, G. A., Fauk, N. K., McLean, C., & Ward, P. R. (2024).Medical tourism among Indonesians: a scoping review. BMC Health Services Research, 24(1), 49.
  23. Supriadi, Al Aufa, B., Nurfikri, A., & Koire, I. I. (2024). Exploring the potential of a multi-level approach to advance the development of the medical tourism industry in Indonesia. Health Services Insights, 17, 11786329241245231.
  24. Mahendradhata, Y. (2019). Proceed with caution: Potential challenges and risks of developing healthcare tourism in Indonesia. Global Public Health, 14(3), 340-350.
  25. Gamalliel, N., & Fuady, A. (2024). Indonesia's new health law: lessons for democratic health governance and legislation. The Lancet Regional Health-Southeast Asia, 23.
  26. Dhillon, I., Jhalani, M., Thamarangsi, T., Siyam, A., & Singh,P. K. (2023). Advancing universal health coverage in the WHO South-East Asia Region with a focus on human resources for health. The Lancet Regional Health-Southeast Asia, 18.
  27. Rivara, F., & Le Menestrel, S. (2016). Committee on the Biological and Psychosocial Effects of Peer Victimization: Lessons for Bullying Prevention, Board on Children, Youth, and Families, Committee on Law and Justice, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Health and Medicine Division, & National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (Eds.).
  28. Puhl, R. M., Suh, Y., & Li, X. (2017). Improving anti- bullying laws and policies to protect youth from weight- based victimization: parental support for action. Pediatric obesity, 12(2), e14-e19.
  29. Hatzenbuehler, M. L., Flores, J. E., Cavanaugh, J. E., Onwuachi-Willig, A., & Ramirez, M. R. (2017). Anti- bullying policies and disparities in bullying: A state-level analysis. American journal of preventive medicine, 53(2), 184-191.
  30. Srabstein, J. C., Berkman, B. E., & Pyntikova, E. (2008). Antibullying legislation: A public health perspective. Journal of Adolescent Health, 42(1), 11-20.
  31. Smith, C. R., Palazzo, S. J., Grubb, P. L., & Gillespie, G. L. (2020). Standing up against workplace bullying behavior: recommendations from newly licensed nurses. Journal of nursing education and practice, 10(7), 35.
  32. Hikmat, R., Yosep, I., Hernawaty, T., & Mardhiyah, A. (2024). A scoping review of anti-bullying interventions: reducingtraumatic effect of bullying among adolescents. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 289-304.
  33. Lu, X., Chen, M., Lu, Z., Shi, X., & Liang, L. (2024). Artificial intelligence tools for optimising recruitment and retention in clinical trials: a scoping review protocol. BMJ open, 14(3), e080032.
  34. Hunkenschroer, A. L., & Kriebitz, A. (2023). Is AI recruiting (un) ethical? A human rights perspective on the use of AI for hiring. AI and Ethics, 3(1), 199-213.
  35. França, T. J. F., São Mamede, H., Barroso, J. M. P., & Dos Santos, V. M. P. D. (2023). Artificial intelligence applied to potential assessment and talent identification in an organisational context. Heliyon, 9(4).
  36. Chen, Z. (2023). Collaboration among recruiters and artificial intelligence: removing human prejudices in employment. Cognition, Technology & Work, 25(1), 135-149.
  37. Keir, G., Hu, W., Filippi, C. G., Ellenbogen, L., & Woldenberg,R. (2023). Using artificial intelligence in medical school admissions screening to decrease inter-and intra-observer variability. JAMIA open, 6(1).
  38. Khosravi, M., Zare, Z., Mojtabaeian, S. M., & Izadi, R. (2024). Artificial intelligence and decision-making in healthcare: a thematic analysis of a systematic review of reviews. Health services research and managerial epidemiology, 11, 23333928241234863.
  39. Schick, J., & Fischer, S. (2021). Dear computer on my desk, which candidate fits best? An assessment of candidates’ perception of assessment quality when using AI in personnel selection. Frontiers in psychology, 12, 739711.
  40. Lydecker, J. A. (2022). Conceptual application of trauma- focused cognitive behavioral therapy to treat victims of bullying. Journal of prevention and health promotion, 3(2), 231-245.
  41. Huang, Y., & Chui, H. (2024). Bullying victims’ perceived social support and psychological health and prosocial behavior: A latent profile analysis. Journal of youth and adolescence, 53(7), 1683-1698.
  42. Ferraz De Camargo, L., Rice, K., & Thorsteinsson, E. B. (2023). Bullying victimization CBT: A proposed psychological intervention for adolescent bullying victims. Frontiers in psychology, 14, 1122843.
  43. Ullah, R., Siddiqui, F., & Zafar, M. S. (2023). Bullying among healthcare professionals and students: Prevalence and recommendations. Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences, 18(5), 1061.
  44. Yosep, I., Hikmat, R., & Mardhiyah, A. (2023). School-based nursing interventions for preventing bullying and reducing its incidence on students: a scoping review. International journal of environmental research and public health, 20(2), 1577.
  45. Afolaranmi, T. O., Hassan, Z. I., Gokir, B. M., Kilani, A.,Igboke, R., Ugwu, K. G., ... & Ofakunrin, A. O. (2022). Workplace bullying and its associated factors among medical doctors in residency training in a tertiary health institution in Plateau State Nigeria. Frontiers in public health, 9, 812979.
  46. Samsudin, E. Z., Isahak, M., Rampal, S., Rosnah, I., & Zakaria, M. I. (2021). Workplace bullying among juniordoctors in Malaysia: A multicentre cross-sectional study. The Malaysian journal of medical sciences: MJMS, 28(2), 142.
  47. Paice, E., Aitken, M., Houghton, A., & Firth-Cozens, J. (2004). Bullying among doctors in training: cross sectional questionnaire survey. Bmj, 329(7467), 658-659.
  48. Averbuch, T., Eliya, Y., & Van Spall, H. G. C. (2021). Systematic review of academic bullying in medical settings: dynamics and consequences. BMJ open, 11(7), e043256.
  49. Anyomih, T. T. K., Mehta, A., Wondoh, P. M., Mehta,A., Siokos, A., & Adjeso, T. (2024). Bullying among medical students and doctors in Ghana: a cross-sectional survey. Singapore medical journal, 10-4103.
  50. Quine, L. (2002). Workplace bullying in junior doctors: questionnaire survey. Bmj, 324(7342), 878-879.
  51. Fatmawati, L. F., & Siregar, K. N. (2024). Workplace bullying among doctors in residency training: a scoping review. BKM Public Health and Community Medicine, e16895-e16895.